Barrack Obama is now the President elect of the United States. Congratululations to him on his victory. He got the votes, and he will be sworn in as our next Presient in January.
While I am not pleased with the outcome of the election, it is done and over. Barring an unforeseen situation, he will become the next President. It is now up to us, the voters, of all persuassions, to keep Obama and his cohorts in the Congress on track, and yes, in check.
Obama and the Democrats have now been handed the keys to the Kingdom. Now we shall see what they do over the next two years. You see, two years is all they can count on, as the next Congressional elections will be in 2010. Obama and the Democrats will have to work a lot of miracles over those two years, or face the wrath of an electorate that will turn their cyicism on them like the did the GOP in 2006.
A person on a message board I regularly post on was worried that expectations may be too high for Obama and the Democrats, and she is an ardent Democrat. Of course the Obama campaign was already laying the ground work for “reduced expectations” several weeks ago. But a great mahy of Obama’s supporters have extremely high, and unreasonable, and unrealistic expectations of what will happen.
Two years. Everything will have to go perfectly for Obama and the Democrats over those two years if they hope to carry on beyond that. The economy will not only have to rebound, but accelerate. There can be no international crisis, especially not one of a violent nature. Al-Qaeda will have to remain silent (web videos don’t count). They will have to meet every voters wants and desires. If they don’t, the electorate will turn on them. They’ve done it before, they’ll do it again. Americans are fickle, self indulgent people, who only care about “what have you done for me lately.” With control of Congress, and the White House, the Democrats will have no one to blame if things don’t go as well as expectations. It’s put up or shut up for them.
The word mandate is being bandied about in some quarters. Sorry, but no, this is not the case. The numbers don’t support that concept. For that matter, very few Presidents have ever had a mandate, the last being Reagan in 1984 (and maybe Johnson in 64). I have not yet poured over all the numbers as yet, mainly because they’re not all available as yet, but a mandate is not indictaed. Too many close races, too many states were close (vote wise, not percentage wise) that a mandate cannot be concluded.
“Always in motion is the future.” Yoda said that. Even though it came form a muppet in a movie, it still is true. We cannot control the future. We can’t even predict it much (all you Edgar Cayce fans just go away now please). Even so, I will get a smug smirk on my face when things don’t suddenly become all wine and roses (or is that Rojas?) next January. The excuses as to why should be entertaining as well.